February 24, 2011

Ipods for the unborn

As shown by this real product, it’s never too early to get “plugged in.”

For a mere $120.00, you too can buy an ipod for your fetus. Sigh.

February 20, 2011

Another lovely quote…

“Good human work honors God’s work. Good work uses no thing without respect, both for what it is in itself and for its origin. It uses neither tool nor material that it does not respect and that it does not love. It honors nature as a great mystery and power, as an indispensable teacher, and as the inescapable judge of all work of human hands. It does not dissociate life and work, or pleasure and work, or love and work, or usefulness and beauty. To work without pleasure or affections, to make a product that is not both useful and beautiful, is to dishonor God, nature, the thing that is made, and whomever it is made for.”

-Wendell Berry from “Christianity and the Survival of Creation”

February 19, 2011

Facebook, efficient relationships, and the “performance of self”
I was watching an interview the other day with an author by the name of Sherry Turkle, from MIT, and she briefly mentioned a few topics I thought were worth discussing…

On my Facebook page, there is a small box that proudly proclaims how popular I am. “You have 182 friends,” it states. According to Facebook, my social life is represented in 182 tiny thumbnails pictures of my “friends” and my interests in life are tidily summed up on my “Info” page.

Every morning I wake up and scan my “News Feed” where an algorithm feeds me the latest news from my 182 friends. It determines what information I should see. I scan the page in 30 seconds, quickly perusing the latest news and minutia from my 182 friends’ lives. Feeling content that I have kept up on my social connections, I grab my lunch and head out the door.

In the evenings, I occasionally load images or messages to my Facebook page. Isolated from others, I carefully curate my latest photos, deeply thinking before I assign captions and “tags.” I consider how to phrase my status update, knowing that 182 friends may see my picture or my status. This thought gives me feelings of grandeur.

My entire social life has become incredibly efficient. In a matter of minutes, I have kept up with my 182 friends. This, according to many, is the “new” way of connecting socially.

With 600 million people “connected” to one another is this way, we have to wonder whether we will eventually forget how to truly connect with each other and our community. As an MIT professor has recently said, “there is a difference between the ‘performance of self’ and ‘self.’”

I would argue that true community requires a level of both privacy and intimacy that is not possible with “social” media. I think deep down, we recognize this. When I look at my “news feed” I do not see the following status updates:

  • I’m thinking of leaving my wife
  • I’m lonely
  • I’m grateful in an inexplicable way for the wonders of life.
  • I’m not sure how to parent my kids
  • We got into a huge fight
  • I feel a sense of contentment and spiritual peace.
  • I’m lost in life.
  • I don’t know what I believe.

These are the sort of intimate details that we only share with those who are closest to us. They’re not the sort of things we share with 182 near-strangers. And so our social media is actually filled with pointless statements:

  • I made brownies today
  • I finished my essay
  • I went for a jog today
  • I love “Glee!”

At the end of the day, we think we’ve had meaningful interactions, but all we’ve really done is publicly postured our lives; all we’ve done is played the role of ourselves; all we’ve done is talked about things that don’t matter. And we’ve done it in an extremely “efficient” way. We have reduced the work of community to a few words and mouse clicks.

True community is both more public and private than this. It is messy and inefficient. In true community, we learn that living peacefully means listening more than talking. It means keeping things to ourselves. It means only allowing the handful of people into our lives who we trust.

At the same time, true community is far more public than “social media.” We cannot curate an image of ourselves when we spend time with each other. Building a house, backpacking through the wilderness, or worshipping beside one another necessitates a certain level of authenticity. We get to see each other’s true selves. This means that true community requires a certain level of vulnerability and tolerance. We find that we must show our true selves — vices and all — to our family, our friends, and our immediate community. In that sense we are vulnerable and trusting in their mutual trust of us, despite our failings. It is these interactions that create the sinews and ligaments of community. And it is these interactions that can never be recreated on a social network.

February 18, 2011

An excellent quote by a personal hero:

“But there are an enormous number of people — and I am one of them — whose native religion is Christianity. We were born to it; we began to learn it before we became conscious; it is, whatever we think of it, and intimate belonging of our being; it informs our consciousness, our language, our dreams. We can turn away from it or against it, but that will only bind us tightly to a reduced version of it. A better possibility is that this, our native religion, should survive and renew itself so that it may become as largely and truly instructive as we need it to be. On such a survival and renewal of the Christian religion may depend the survival of the Creation that is its subject.”

- Wendell Berry from “Christianity and the Survival of Creation”

February 13, 2011

Totalitarian Economies and the Third Interest

Lately, I’ve been reading an essay by Wendell Berry called “Sex, Economy, Freedom, Community.” Written in 1993, it’s no less relevant today than it was nearly twenty years ago. In the essay, there are a number of things that have caught my attention. And while I have spent the last five days trying to come up with some brilliant way to respond, it’s just not happening. That said, Berry proposes two different ideas that have really got me thinking.

Totalitarian Economies

The first is a small phrase where he talks about the power of “totalitarian economics.” In an era of “too big to fail” and massive bailouts of massive corporations, one must question whether our society (and our politics) is now ruled by a totalitarian economy. If we take the definition of totalitarian as power that “recognizes no limits to its authority and strives to regulate every aspect of public and private life wherever feasible” then I would argue that our national/global economy often exercises totalitarian demands.  And, if we agree that this is to some degree true, than we must confront the differences between the totalitarianism of one man or one political party, and the totalitarianism of  our daily bread

The Third Interest

The second thought that has been intriguing me is this: Berry argues that in all modern discourse, there is usually talk only about the “private” and the “public.” When the Patriot Act passed, for instance, the debate centered over public safety and private freedoms. When a state chooses to bulldoze a neighborhood to put in a freeway, the debate centers over private property and the public good. Berry argues that there is a third concern that almost never makes it into public discourse: the needs, rights, and freedoms of the community. Let me give you an excerpt:

“‘Public’ and ‘community’ then, are different — perhaps radically different — concepts that under certain circumstances are compatible but that, in the present economic and technological monoculture, tend to be at odds. A community, when it is alive and well, is centered on the household — the family place and economy — and the household is centered on marriage. A public, when it is working in the best way — that is, as a political body intent on justice — is centered on the individual. Community and public alike, then, are founded on respect — the one on respect for the family, the other on respect for the individual. Both forms of respect are deeply traditional, and they are not fundamentally incompatible. But they are different, and that difference, once it is instituted in general assumptions, can be the source of much damage and much danger.”

More to come…

February 3, 2011

A new topic…

While I don’t want to go all nerdy, I thought this blog might be a good place to occasionally address issues in tech and web development, especially if it relates to the larger world. As many of you know, I design and develop websites in my spare time. With this in mind, I’ve linked to a .pdf I’ve created that outlines how to drive more internet traffic to your site by leveraging social media. If you do maintain your own site, you might want to check this out.

About Erik Johnson
Erik Johnson, author of Northern Vista

About Erik Johnson:
I'm a high school English teacher in Anchorage, Alaska. My wife and I are the proud parents of three young Alaskans: Elias, River and Aurora. This website is dedicated to exploring faith, economics, sustainability, and Alaska living.

Read more about Erik T. Johnson and this website...

Connect
Shameless
Self-promotion
Categories
Pages
Blogs I'm following
Login